I work in the AVIS lab at UCSC and Alex Pang is my advisor. We are usually working very hard except when it's windy and Alex takes off to ride the waves -- of course I continue to work ;)
I also work closely with Dr. David Kao who works for the data analysis group at NASA Ames research center. My research interests are computer graphics and scientific visualization.


Following is a quick index to find things fast in this page:
Research Projects
Ph.D. Proposal
Vortex core comparison in flow fields

Feature based streamline placement

A texture synthesis technique for flow visualization

Decimation of tetrahedral grids for direct volume rendering

Publications
Presentations
Poster


RESEARCH PROJECTS
Following is a partial list of my research projects:

Ph.D. PROPOSAL

I advanced to candidacy in June, 1999 and I have proposed research in the area of comparative visualization. The past decade has witnessed the emergence of visualization as an inseparable part of data exploration and analysis. Increase in computing power and advances in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) have enabled scientists to have more accurate models and run simulations that generate huge datasets. My research is concerned with the study of vector field data defined over the discrete locations in three dimensions. Flow field data is computed using batch jobs on super computers but visualization demands interactivity. This demand on visualization has been somewhat of a burden in recent years and in an effort to use desktop tools for visualization, there has been a drive to generate visualizations using a simplified model of the original data. A simplified model often throws away information that could be crucial. Hence, there is a real need to have tools that would help in understanding the difference in the original and approximated datasets. The simplest of comparison approaches are image-level and data-level comparisons. Image level comparisons use visualization images and image processing to study the differences in the datasets. Data-level comparisons use the raw data for comparisons. Another approach to do comparison is to use feature-level comparisons. My proposal is to develop methods to compare some of the flow features commonly extracted from a flow data. I am exploring methods to compare streamlines, streamribbons, and vorex cores.
A copy of my proposal is available online.
PhD Proposal (UCSC, May 1999)
Color Images
Here are some images from the above work:
Above image: Left image compares two ribbons as an overlay and the right image compares them by "unfolding" and "flattening" one of the ribbons and comparing the other w.r.t. the first one.


VORTEX CORE COMPARISON IN FLOW FIELDS

I am currently exploring ways to compare vortex cores that are extracted from two different datasets. These datasets could be from wind tunnel experiments or different CFD solvers.

Dataset used: Delta wing (courtesy: Neal Chaderjian, NASA Ames)

FEATURE BASED STREAMLINE PLACEMENT

Streamlines are a popular visualization primitive used to explore flow fields. One big problem with using streamlines to study flow fields is that if the streamlines are not placed at proper locations then they tend to create clutter and can miss important details. We have developed a method for streamline placement that is guided by the features in the flow (like critical points) and guarantees that all the important features will be highlighted by the flow. In addition our method produces aesthetically pleasing vstreamline visualizations. This work was done in collaboratin with my advisor Alex Pang and Dr. David Kao from NASA ames research center.

Above image: A sparse streamline visualization showing five critical points.


A TEXTURE SYNTHESIS TECHNIQUE FOR FLOW VISUALIZATION

We have developed a method called PLIC (pseudo line integratal convolution). PLIC can generate visualizations that span the spectrum of streamline-like to LIC-like. This work was done in collaboratin with my advisor Alex Pang and Dr. David Kao from NASA ames research center.




Above images: PLIC visualizations of two datasets. Top: bluntfin; Bottom: dynamc vortices (courtesy: Ravi Samtaney, NASA Ames)


DECIMATION OF TETRAHEDRAL GRIDS FOR DIRECT VOLUME RENDERING

Often the data generated by CFD simulations is so huge that it's impossible to visualize it interactively. Tetrahedral grids are very common in FEM modeling and CFD. As part of work for my Masters degree I developed a method to decimate tetrahedral grids. The method iteratively deletes vertices from the grid based on an error metric. The resulting hole in the grid is patched using a local re-tetrahedralization. This research was done in collaboration with
Prof. Allen Van Gelder and Prof. Jane Wilhelms.


Above images: The image on the left is a direct volume rendering of a dataset called lftr (langley fighter, courtesy NASA Ames). The image on the left is rendering using the original grid. For the middle image the grid was decimated by 80% and for the right image the grid was decimated by 95%.



Above images: When we decimate the tetrahedral grid, we have to take special care when we delete vertices from the surface of the grid. We use a separate error metric for the surface vertices. Note that deleting vertices from the surface has problems similar to surface decimaiton. Left image: original surface detail; Middle and Right images: grid decimated by 80% using two different error metrics for the surface.




Above two images: We also evaluated the quality of the decimated grids using isosurface extraction algorithms. Top: original grid; Bottom: grid decimated by 80%.



PUBLICATIONS

Vivek Verma, David Kao, Alex Pang.
``A Flow-guided Streamline Seeding Strategy''.
Proceedings of IEEE Visualization 2000, Salt Lake City, October 2000.

Vivek Verma, David Kao, Alex Pang.
``PLIC: Bridging the Gap Between Streamlines and LIC''.
Proceedings of IEEE Visualization '99, San Francisco, October 1999.

Allen Van Gelder, Vivek Verma, and Jane Wilhelms.
``Volume Decimation of Irregular Tetrahedral Grids''.
Computer Graphics International, Canada, June 1999.
gzipped paper Color Images

Vivek Verma and Allen Van Gelder.
``Decimation of Tetrahedral Grids With Error Control''.
UCSC Technical Report number UCSC-CRL-97-25 , June 1998.

Jonathan Gibbs, Allen Van Gelder, Vivek Verma and Jane Wilhelms.
``Rapid Decimation For Direct Volume Rendering''.
UCSC Technical Report number UCSC-CRL-97-26, December 1997.

Vivek Verma.
``Accelerating Convergence of Time Integrating Procedures Using Recursive Projection Method''.
Masters Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, May 1994.


PRESENTATIONS
Slides from IEEE visualization '99 conference in San Francisco
slides from presentation at Vis Lunch (an attempt to use HTML for presentations)


POSTER
Here is a
poster I created for an open house at NASA Ames.



Copyright © 1994-2000 Vivek Verma
All Rights Reserved.