Proof Techniques. (author unknown)
This is a list of proof techniques that are very powerful,
but unfortunately not valid. -- from a copy posted on unknown
professor's door.
-
Proof by cumbersome notation:
Best done with access to at least four alphabets and special symbols.
-
Proof by exhaustion :
An issue or two of a journal devoted to your proof is useful.
-
Proof by omission :
"The reader may easily supply the details."
"The other 253 cases are analogous."
"..."
-
Proof by obfuscation :
A long plotless sequence of true and/or meaningless syntactically
related statements.
-
Proof by wishful citation :
The author cites the negation, converse, or generalization of a theorem
from the literature to support his claims.
-
Proof by funding :
How could three different government agencies be wrong?
-
Proof by eminent authority :
`I saw Karp in the elevator and he said it was probably NP-complete.'
-
Proof by personal communication :
`Eight-dimensional colored cycle stripping is NP-complete' [Karp,
personal communication].
-
Proof by reduction to the wrong problem :
`To see that infinite-dimensional colored cycle stripping is
decidable, we reduce it to the halting problem.'
-
Proof by reference to inaccessible literature :
The author cites a simple corollary of a theorem to be found in a
privately circulated memoir of the Slovenian Philological Society, 1883.
-
Proof by importance:
A large body of useful consequences all follow from the proposition
in question.
-
Proof by accumulated evidence :
Long and dilligent search has not revealed a counterexample.
-
Proof by cosmology :
The negation of the proposition is unimaginable or meaningless.
Popular for proofs of the existence of God.
-
Proof by mutual reference :
In reference A, Theorem 5 is said to follow from Theorem 3 in
reference B, which is shown to follow from Corollary 6.2 in
reference C, which is an easy consequence of Theorem 5 in reference A.
-
Proof by metaproof :
A method is given to construct the desired proof. The correctness
of the method is proved by any of these techniques.
-
Proof by picture :
A more convincing form of proof by example. Combines well with
proof by omission.
-
Proof by vehement assertion :
It is useful to have some kind of authority relation to the audience.
-
Proof by ghost reference :
Nothing even remotely resembling the cited theorem appears in the
reference given.
-
Proof by forward reference :
Reference is usually to a forthcoming paper of the author, which is
often not as forthcoming as the first.
-
Proof by semantic shift :
Some standard but inconvenient definitions are changed for
the statement of the result.
-
Proof by appeal to intuition :
Cloud-shaped drawings frequently help here.