after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 1. 1355, Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 75 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points ->Other, no make clean to rm *.o files, core, and executable -5 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: being able to rotate, translate, and scale with the mouse +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 2. 8441, Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 75 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3: -5 minor errors with translating with the mouse, gets reset to the center after releasing the mouse and selecting it to translate again. Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: color sliders, line width adjuster, pyramid shape, mini axis for current shape position. +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 3. 3467, Assignment 3 grade: 95 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 75 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points ->Other, no make clean to rm *.o files, core, and executable -5 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 4. 8658, Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 5. 7041, Assignment 3 grade: 105 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: solar system, different polygons, and curves +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 6. 4457, Assignment 3 grade: 95 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: nice animation in the beginning +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 7. 7457, Assignment 3 grade: 10 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: Nothing worked ->stage 1: 30 points ->stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 8. 6450, Assignment 3 grade: 70 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 60 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3: trackball rotate does not work, -15 points ->Other, no make clean to rm *.o files, core, and executable -5 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 10. 4173, Assignment 3 grade: 90 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 11. 8197, Assignment 3 grade: 70 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 60 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: rotate using mouse track ball is incorrect, rotations were wrong, -15points ->Other, no make clean to rm *.o files, core, and executable -5 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 12. 8839, Assignment 3 grade: 90 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 13. 4510, Assignment 3 grade: 80 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 70 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3: little slow -10 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 14. 1594, Assignment 3 grade: 90 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 15. 5917, Assignment 3 grade: 75 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 65 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points -> stage 3: rotate x, y does not work with trackball, -15 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 16. 7143, Assignment 3 grade: 10 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: Did not compile, nothing shows up ->stage 1: 30 points ->stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 17. 1435, Assignment 3 grade: 60 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 50 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3:trackball does not work -30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. ---------------------------------- 18. 9024, Assignment 3 grade: 90 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: ->1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 7241, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 5 = 105 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: World rotation, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 1800, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 2 = 102 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: good quit button graphics, +2 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 7033, Your Assignment 3 grade: 97 + 5 = 102 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: world rotation, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 8400, Your Assignment 3 grade: 40 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 40 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points ->stage 2: no rotation, no Z scale, -10 points ->stage 3: no trackball, -30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 7932, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 5 = 105 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: additional models besides cube Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 6037, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 3 = 103 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 3 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: very nice density function, original Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 2282, Your Assignment 3 grade: 97 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 6997, Your Assignment 3 grade: 97 + 5 = 102 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, nothing showing at start, even after color change. - 3 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: world rotation, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 8767, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 5 = 105 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: world rotation, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 4355, Your Assignment 3 grade: 95 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 75 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: scale z don't work, -5 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 3459, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 5 = 105 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: very nice spin effect, original, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 0405, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 3102, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 4426, Your Assignment 3 grade: 97 + 5 = 102 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: world rotation, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 1985, Your Assignment 3 grade: 92 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 73 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points ->stage 3: trackball not done well, jerky motion, - 7 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 0 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 ->other, way to simple, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 5820, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 + 5 = 105 ---------------------------------- good job! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: world rotation, +5 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. after Friday,(Apr 26) 08:00am. -10 points ---------------------------------- 9630, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3. --------------------------------- 5889, Your Assignment 3 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: stage 1: 30 points stage 2: 20 points stage 3: 30 points Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 ... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 3.