after Thursday (Apr 18) 08:00am, - 10 points before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points 1. ---------------------------------- ID: 7932 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+2 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 4 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points nice bckground, ellipse, +2 2. ---------------------------------- ID: 4173 Your Assignment 2 grade: 90+3 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 70 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -10 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 3 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: undelete, +1 before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 3. ---------------------------------- ID: 8658 Your Assignment 2 grade: 73+2 ---------------------------------- crashes all the time. Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 25 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 ->didn't pick, crashes all the time,-25 didn't translate, crashes all the time,-30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 4. ---------------------------------- ID: 0405 Your Assignment 2 grade: 60+2 ---------------------------------- core dump too! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 40 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 ->didn't pick, -10 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: turned in before Tuesday, 8am Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 5. ---------------------------------- ID: 8441 Your Assignment 2 grade: 97 ---------------------------------- > make g++ -g -ansi -Wall -c main.cxx -I/projects/public/fltk/sunos/1.0.9/include g++ -g -ansi -Wall -c gui.cxx -I/projects/public/fltk/sunos/1.0.9/include gui.cxx: In method `void UI::cb_polygon_i(class Fl_Button *, void *)': gui.cxx:76: no matching function for call to `OGL_Window::set_polyFlag ()' *** Error code 1 make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `gui.o' Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, -25 ->didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 6. ---------------------------------- ID: 6997 Your Assignment 2 grade: 35 ---------------------------------- core dumps. Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, linked list don't work,-10 ->didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 7. ---------------------------------- ID: 1335 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+6.5 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 2.5 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 4 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points ease of use, nice! + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 8. ---------------------------------- ID: 3102 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, -25 ->didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 5, 0 - rotation 5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 9. ---------------------------------- ID: 7143 Your Assignment 2 grade: 17 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, -25 ->didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 2.5 - rotation 2.5, 2.5 - scaling 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 10. ---------------------------------- ID: 2282 Your Assignment 2 grade: 85 +2 ---------------------------------- The student program didn't run in submit directory. After meeting with her, she showed me that it works under her own directory. Deletion do not work, core dumps due to partition full but student's directory is not over quota. I'll give her points based on her program performance in her home directory. Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 65 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, no deletion, -10 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, core dumps, -5 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 11.---------------------------------- ID: 0155 Your Assignment 2 grade: 17+2 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, -25 ->didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 2.5 - rotation 2.5, 2.5 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 12. ---------------------------------- ID: 8767 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+5 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: set color, +3 ease of use, +2 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 13.---------------------------------- ID: 1435 Your Assignment 2 grade: 45+2 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 25 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 14. ---------------------------------- ID: 5889 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+2 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 15. ---------------------------------- ID: 3467 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 16. ---------------------------------- ID: 6037 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+3 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 3 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points nice buttons, +1 Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 17.---------------------------------- ID: 7241 Your Assignment 2 grade: 75 + 4 ---------------------------------- nice readme! Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 55 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 4 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: nice readme!, +2 before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 18. ---------------------------------- ID: 4426 Your Assignment 2 grade: 75+2 ---------------------------------- good readme. core dumps. Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: ->didn't create objects, core dump, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. graded on wed. ---------------------------------- ID: 7033 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 + 4.5 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -0, -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 2.5 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: turned in before Tuesday, 8am Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. after Thursday (Apr 18) 08:00am, - 10 points before Tuesday,(Apr 16) 08:00am. + 2 points 1. ---------------------------------- ID: 6450 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+2 early ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 2. ---------------------------------- ID: 5820 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 + 2.5 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 2.5 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 3. ---------------------------------- ID: 7041 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+10 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 2.5 - rotation 2.5, 2.5 - scaling 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: grid, and palette color Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 4. ---------------------------------- ID: 1985 Your Assignment 2 grade: 75 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 65 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 ->didn't translate, -15 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 5. ---------------------------------- ID: 5917 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 + 2 early ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 2 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Early submission Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 6. ---------------------------------- ID: 4355 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+2 early ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 7. ---------------------------------- ID: 7457 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+2 early ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 2.5 - rotation 2.5, 2.5 - scaling 5, 5 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 8. ---------------------------------- ID: 8400 Your Assignment 2 grade:35 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 20 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 0 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 ->No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 9. ---------------------------------- ID: 1594 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100+2 early ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 10. ---------------------------------- ID: 9024 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 11. ---------------------------------- ID: 1800 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 12. ---------------------------------- ID: 9630 Your Assignment 2 grade: 20 did not compile ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, -> did not compile under microsoft visual c++, gave errors /* Compiling... gui.cxx x:\trich\gui.cxx(183) : error C2065: 'scale1' : undeclared identifier x:\trich\gui.cxx(183) : error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'class Fl_Box *' to 'int' This conversion requires a reinterpret_cast, a C-style cast or function-style cast x:\trich\gui.cxx(186) : error C2065: 'scale2' : undeclared identifier x:\trich\gui.cxx(186) : error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'class Fl_Box *' to 'int' This conversion requires a reinterpret_cast, a C-style cast or function-style cast x:\trich\gui.cxx(189) : error C2065: 'scale3' : undeclared identifier x:\trich\gui.cxx(189) : error C2440: '=' : cannot convert from 'class Fl_Box *' to 'int' This conversion requires a reinterpret_cast, a C-style cast or function-style cast Error executing cl.exe. Paint.exe - 6 error(s), 0 warning(s) */ 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 14. ---------------------------------- ID: 4457 Your Assignment 2 grade: 17 , missing t1.dsp file ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 2 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: ->Too simple, -3 , no name No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 15. ---------------------------------- ID: 4510 Your Assignment 2 grade: 10, missing StdAfx.cpp file ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 0 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, -10 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: -> 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 16. ---------------------------------- ID: 8839 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2. 17. ---------------------------------- ID: 3459 Your Assignment 2 grade: 100 ---------------------------------- Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ----------------------------------------------------- 80, 80 -Functionality: correctly produced output Reason for point lose: didn't create objects, -25 didn't pick, -25 didn't translate, -30 Other, 5, 5 -Readability: Indentation, code clearity 5, 5 -Readability: Good in program documentation,commenting Reason for point lose: Not enough commenting: -1, -2, -3 No commenting, -5 5, 5 -Style: Good ReadME file Reason for point lose: Too simple, -3 No ReadMe, -5 5, 5 -Efficiency: Reason for point lose: Slow run time execution, -5 0, 0 -Assignment on time Reason for point lose: 1 day late: -10 2 day late: -100 .... 10 day late: -100 Extra credit: Format:Possible points, Points earned, Criteria ------------------------------------------------------- 2.5, 0 - rotation 2.5, 0 - scaling 5, 0 - any other neat effects that we didn't even think of Reason for point gain: Additional Note: Everyone gets 5 point for efficiency in assignment 2.